Thanks Brian - that's a bit too complex a read in the middle of my normal (non-coding) working day, so I'll have to try and digest your comments and think how best to represent in a graph. But I may have to come back to your for clarification...I like the idea. I actually threw a stack together last night to test/verify flow. That side route should be “not in” but before/after still will get called. If you pass in the object, then both “on” handlers will fire before the “after” one will. If you pass in the behavior, then the “after” will fire and then message heads on. Without the pass, the message stops. I did not test a second level to see if you can pass before/after.
I find creating things like these hugely helpful for me and I hope may help others - your input is greatly appreciated...
Stam
Statistics: Posted by stam — Wed May 08, 2024 5:30 pm